<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>byJoeyBaker &#187; Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://byjoeybaker.com/category/creative/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://byjoeybaker.com</link>
	<description>The &#039;new media&#039; evolution according to a millennial photographer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:57:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Signed and Released: Side Projects Are So Good</title>
		<link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/07/01/signed-and-released-side-projects-are-so-good/</link>
		<comments>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/07/01/signed-and-released-side-projects-are-so-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linked Photographer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/?p=1270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two side projects I've been working on: <a href="http://vancouverproject.com">The Vancouver Project</a> and <a href="http://linkedphotog.com">Linked Photographer</a> are now official.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Common thinking in the photography industry is to always have a side project going in addition to your main job. Work, even photography work, is tough. You&#8217;ve got to have a personal project going to keep you sane.
Turns out having a side project can lead to some really good work too. Just ask <a class="zem_slink" title="Google" rel="homepage" href="http://google.com">Google</a> about their <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/05/googles-20-percent-time-in-action.html">20% rule</a>.
After a long time of not following this sage advice, I am now fortunate enough to announce two.
<h3>The Vancouver Project</h3>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1272" title="vcp_logo" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/vcp_logo.png" alt="vcp_logo" width="500" /></p>
<div class="clear"><span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span></div>
A good friend of mine, <a id="aptureLink_sQ6HSGKaPg" href="http://twitter.com/haburton">Andrew Burton</a>, and I have been talking for a couple of months about the rise of <a class="zem_slink" title="Digital single-lens reflex camera" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_single-lens_reflex_camera">DSLRs</a> with video capability and what it the implications for sports photographers.
Andrew had the foresight to see that this new technology would come to head in the very near future – namely the coming winter <a id="aptureLink_y7UbeUCDpp" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010%20Winter%20Olympics">Olympics in Vancouver</a>. Exploring thought, we also realized that this Olympics would be the first since the rise of the real-time web, live video broadcasting from cell phones, Google Wave, and, and, and.
Our realization lead to a plan of action which we&#8217;re calling <a href="http://vancouverproject.com" target="_blank">The Vancouver Project</a>. Stop by and check us out.
<em>Shameless plug: if you&#8217;re in a position to help by spreading the word to the right people we&#8217;d love to <a href="http://vancouverproject.com/join">hear from you</a>.</em>
<h3>Linked Photographer</h3>
<img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-1271" title="Publishing-Agreement" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Publishing-Agreement-150x150.jpg" alt="Publishing-Agreement" width="150" height="150" />
In other news, I&#8217;m writing a book.
That is a very weird sentence for me to write. I write posts, tweets, cutlines… not books. But, apparently, that&#8217;s happening :)
An excellent friend of mine, and phenomenal fashion photographer, <a href="http://twitter.com/lindsayadler">Lindsay Adler</a>, approached a few months ago saying that she was looking into writing a book, would I be interested in co-authoring?
Today, I signed the contract. We&#8217;ll be writing a book that&#8217;s got the tentative title <em>Linked Photographer</em>. It will be part treaties, part howto, and part reference on how photographers can use social media for business. It&#8217;s a bit more than a for-dummies book, but
We&#8217;ll be launching <a href="http://linkedphotog.com">linkedphotog.com</a> soon, so stay tuned!
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=63ad5a3d-cd51-4212-8212-943777165040" alt="" /><span class="zem-script pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div><strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/08/10/olympicpix/" rel="bookmark" title="August 10, 2008">&#8216;Olympicpix&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/05/25/how-not-to-do-newspaper-video/" rel="bookmark" title="May 25, 2008">How Not to Do Newspaper Video</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/04/14/cbs-journalist-freed-in-iraqi-raid-new-york-times/" rel="bookmark" title="April 14, 2008">CBS Journalist Freed in Iraqi Raid &#8211; New York Times</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/06/21/connecting-another-dots/" rel="bookmark" title="June 21, 2008">Connecting Another Dot(s)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/09/21/new-media-chaos/" rel="bookmark" title="September 21, 2008">&#8216;New Media&#8217; Chaos</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 23.215 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/07/01/signed-and-released-side-projects-are-so-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LIVE &#124; NPPA Photo Workshop</title>
		<link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/04/16/live-nppa-photo-workshop/</link>
		<comments>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/04/16/live-nppa-photo-workshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photojournalsim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/?p=1109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'll be livestreaming the Syracuse University NPPA photo workshop at 4:00pm EST. Click the link to watch here, or go straight to the Mogulus channel at <a id="aptureLink_cwTM2WQGw7" href="http://mogulus.com/cutline">mogulus.com/cutline</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll be livestreaming the Syracuse University <a id="aptureLink_R1YCcnduB0" href="http://www.nppa.org/">NPPA</a> photo workshop at 4:00pm EST. Click the link to watch here, or go straight to the Mogulus channel at <a id="aptureLink_cwTM2WQGw7" href="http://mogulus.com/cutline">mogulus.com/cutline</a>.<span id="more-1109"></span>
<script src="http://static.mogulus.com/scripts/playerv2.js?channel=cutline&amp;layout=playerEmbedDefault&amp;backgroundColor=0xffffff&amp;backgroundAlpha=1&amp;backgroundGradientStrength=0&amp;chromeColor=0x000000&amp;headerBarGlossEnabled=true&amp;controlBarGlossEnabled=true&amp;chatInputGlossEnabled=false&amp;uiWhite=true&amp;uiAlpha=0.5&amp;uiSelectedAlpha=1&amp;dropShadowEnabled=true&amp;dropShadowHorizontalDistance=10&amp;dropShadowVerticalDistance=10&amp;paddingLeft=10&amp;paddingRight=10&amp;paddingTop=10&amp;paddingBottom=10&amp;cornerRadius=3&amp;backToDirectoryURL=null&amp;bannerURL=null&amp;bannerText=null&amp;bannerWidth=320&amp;bannerHeight=50&amp;showViewers=true&amp;embedEnabled=true&amp;chatEnabled=true&amp;onDemandEnabled=true&amp;programGuideEnabled=false&amp;fullScreenEnabled=true&amp;reportAbuseEnabled=false&amp;gridEnabled=false&amp;initialIsOn=true&amp;initialIsMute=false&amp;initialVolume=10&amp;contentId=null&amp;initThumbUrl=null&amp;playeraspectwidth=4&amp;playeraspectheight=3&amp;mogulusLogoEnabled=true&amp;width=550&amp;height=100%&amp;wmode=window" type="text/javascript"></script><strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/04/03/tomorrow-live-do-palooza/" rel="bookmark" title="April 3, 2009">LIVE | D.O. Palooza</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/07/08/welcome-adorama-joe-mcnallys-blog/" rel="bookmark" title="July 8, 2008">Welcome Adorama! | Joe McNally&#8217;s Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/03/30/coda-confidential/" rel="bookmark" title="March 30, 2008">Coda Confidential</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/04/17/swat-photo-essays-time/" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2008">SWAT! &#8211; Photo Essays &#8211; TIME</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/03/17/three-days-in-and-out-of-tibet-photo-essays-time/" rel="bookmark" title="March 17, 2008">Three Days in and Out of Tibet &#8211; Photo Essays &#8211; TIME</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 39.569 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/04/16/live-nppa-photo-workshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightroom or Aperture?</title>
		<link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/03/02/lightroom-or-aperture/</link>
		<comments>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/03/02/lightroom-or-aperture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/?p=882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This gets filed under the old news category, but I thought I'd share a demo I did on <a id="aptureLink_XwJzU49yci" href="http://adobe.com/lightroom">Lightroom</a> several months ago. (oh, and that's my first submission to <a id="aptureLink_Hl0GoXowEt" href="http://www.slideshare.net/">slideshare</a>!)
<img class="alignleft" title="Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2 Icon" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d1/Adobe_Lightroom_Icon.png/202px-Adobe_Lightroom_Icon.png" alt="Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2 Icon" width="109" height="109" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 119px"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Adobe_Lightroom_Icon.png" rel="shadowbox[post-882];player=img;" title="Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2 Icon"><img class="  " title="Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2 Icon" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d1/Adobe_Lightroom_Icon.png/202px-Adobe_Lightroom_Icon.png" alt="Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2 Icon" width="109" height="109" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image via Wikipedia</p></div>
This gets filed under the old news category, but I thought I&#8217;d share a demo I did on <a id="aptureLink_XwJzU49yci" href="http://adobe.com/lightroom">Lightroom</a> several months ago. (oh, and that&#8217;s my first submission to <a id="aptureLink_Hl0GoXowEt" href="http://www.slideshare.net/">slideshare</a>!)
<div style="width: 425px; text-align: left;"><a style="font:14px Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif;display:block;margin:12px 0 3px 0;text-decoration:underline;" title="Lightroom Workflow Intro" href="http://www.slideshare.net/jbaker071/lightroom-workflow-intro?type=powerpoint">Lightroom Workflow Intro</a><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=workflow-090302125255-phpapp01&amp;rel=0&amp;stripped_title=lightroom-workflow-intro" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=workflow-090302125255-phpapp01&amp;rel=0&amp;stripped_title=lightroom-workflow-intro" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"> </embed></object></div>
<div id="__ss_1091306" style="width: 425px; text-align: left;">
<div style="font-size: 11px; font-family: tahoma,arial; height: 26px; padding-top: 2px;">View more <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/">presentations</a> from <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/jbaker071">jbaker071</a>. (tags: <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://slideshare.net/tag/photography">photography</a> <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://slideshare.net/tag/software">software</a>)</div>
<div style="font-size: 11px; font-family: tahoma,arial; height: 26px; padding-top: 2px;"><span style="font-family: Georgia; font-size: 13px;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="333" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2148331&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=a10000&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="333" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2148331&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=a10000&amp;fullscreen=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"> </embed></object></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 11px; font-family: tahoma,arial; height: 26px; padding-top: 2px;"><span style="font-family: Georgia; font-size: 13px;">
</span></div>
</div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><span class="zem-script more-related"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div><strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/04/02/lightroom-journal-lightroom-2-beta-available/" rel="bookmark" title="April 2, 2008">Lightroom Journal: Lightroom 2 Beta Available</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/03/17/lightroomnews-%c2%bb-blog-archive-%c2%bb-adobe-yanks-lightroom-14-camera-raw-44-2/" rel="bookmark" title="March 17, 2008">LightroomNews  » Blog Archive   » Adobe Yanks Lightroom 1.4 &#038; Camera Raw 4.4</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/04/11/adobe-releases-lightroom-141-camera-raw-441-updates/" rel="bookmark" title="April 11, 2008">Adobe Releases Lightroom 1.4.1, Camera Raw 4.4.1 Updates</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/07/01/signed-and-released-side-projects-are-so-good/" rel="bookmark" title="July 1, 2009">Signed and Released: Side Projects Are So Good</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/03/26/lightroom-14-sucks/" rel="bookmark" title="March 26, 2008">Lightroom 1.4 &#8211; Sucks</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 16.396 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/03/02/lightroom-or-aperture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Nikon D3 Sucks (and What the D4 Oughta Be)</title>
		<link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/01/08/nikon-d3/</link>
		<comments>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/01/08/nikon-d3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photojournalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/blog/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What I'd like to see on the Nikon D4, that the D3 is lacking.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a id="aptureLink_hy8xEcxyVg" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: auto; text-align: center; display: inline !important; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 6px;" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/-5m/3512286565/" title="Nikon D3"><img style="border: 0px initial initial;" title="Nikon D3" src="http://static.flickr.com/3362/3512286565_8cdd9507b2.jpg" alt="" width="500px" height="332px" /></a></p>
<p>I love me the <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/ProductDetail.page?pid=25434">Nikon D3</a>. It&#8217;s the first camera that I&#8217;ve used where I feel confident going into any situation. The high ISO performance, huge LCD, dual CF card slots, 9 FPS, and 12MP files are amazing. Safe to say, Nikon hit a home run with this camera.  That said, I&#8217;ve got some complaints. Call it a wish list if you will. But after using this camera for about 6 months in a wide variety of situations, it&#8217;s pretty safe to say that the tool isn&#8217;t perfect.  With the <a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1228104060.html">release of the D3x</a>, I&#8217;ve come to realize that Nikon is advancing technology, but is clearly holding out for the next release to do anything drastic.  I might/probably am too late to get into the <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d4.htm">D4 product cycle</a>, but nonetheless…</p>
<h3>What could be fixed for the Nikon D4</h3>
<div id="attachment_481" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-full wp-image-481 " title="ok" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ok.jpg" alt="ok" width="150" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The D90 gets the OK button right. Why can</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>The OK button is useless.</strong> There are two ways to confirm a command in the menu system: hit OK, or hit the center of the 4-way dial. However, most things only require you to hit the &#8216;right&#8217; button on the 4-way dial. The OK button, aside from being repetitive, is out of the wa  I&#8217;d like to see a repeat of the D90&#8242;s solution. Replace the &#8216;push the center to confirm&#8217; option of the 4-way control with the OK button. This reduces clutter and makes menu navigating a more one-handed operation.</p>
<p><span id="more-472"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_479" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-full wp-image-479 " title="iso" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/iso.jpg" alt="Small ISO button" width="150" height="65" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Small ISO button</p></div>
<p><strong>ISO input isn&#8217;t always visible.</strong> God love &#8216;em, Nikon has made the ISO on this camera kick-ass. I&#8217;ve got no problem instantly turning the D3 up to 3200 ISO. The issue is that I&#8217;ve got to take my eyes away from the viewfinder to do that. Oh, and I can&#8217;t see that change on the top LCD like I can see shutter speed and aperture. I&#8217;ve got to go down to the bottom LCD.  Now, this sorta makes sense because the <em>small</em> *hinthint* ISO button is right next to the bottom LCD. But, use the camera for just a few hours, and <em>reaching</em> for that button is as intuitive as looking at the top LCD to see what setting you&#8217;re changing. <em>Looking</em> at the bottom LCD is not. The D4 oughta have a bigger ISO button and have changes visible on the top LCD — perhaps in addition to in the viewfinder would be fantastic.  <strong>Movie mode.</strong> Yes, this is sorta cheating. No camera did movies when the D3 came out. But I fully expect video on the D4.  It better. :) ← <em><span style="color: #800000;">Now on the D3s!</span></em></p>
<div id="attachment_477" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-full wp-image-477 " title="popup" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/popup.jpg" alt="popup" width="150" height="87" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Lack of pop-up flash to be a commander unit.</p></div>
<p><strong>No i-TTL built in.</strong> Okay, I get it. Pop-up flashes suck. And the Japanese think it&#8217;s the mark of an amateur camera. Fine. I don&#8217;t need a pop-up flash.  What I do want, is a built in iTTL commander unit. Like an <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/ProductDetail.page?pid=4794">SU-800</a> built in. It would mean not having to carry a flash unit just to be a commander. That slims down on weight and makes the camera less bulking during use.</p>
<div id="attachment_480" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-480 " title="focus" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/focus-150x150.jpg" alt="focus" width="150" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Looks like the M setting is further apart right? It</p></div>
<p><strong>The focus switch isn&#8217;t eyes free.</strong> Not a huge pet-peeve of mine; I can find the switch on the front of the camera to switch focus modes between Manual, Single, and Continuous pretty easily. Perhaps spacing out the settings (sorta like the markings would make you believe the switch is doing) so that we can feel when we go to manual.</p>
<div id="attachment_476" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.moosenewsblog.com/2008/12/nikons-gp-1-now-in-hand/" class="broken_link" title="picture-2"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-476 " title="picture-2" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-2-150x150.jpg" alt="credit: Moose Peterson" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">credit: Moose Peterson</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>GPS</strong>. This is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System">really old</a> technology now. Nikon&#8217;s even built it in to <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0808/08080702nikonp6000.asp">point and shoots</a>. Why do we have to deal with this annoying dongle to get GPS on the high end cameras. Can we get something built in please? Even if the radio defaults to &#8216;off&#8217; to save battery, it sure would be nice to have geo-tagging become standard meta-data that all cameras provide. (Let&#8217;s go EXIF, you can update!)  <a href="http://www.digicamhelp.com/images/CameraFeatures/soulmate.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-472];player=img;"></a><a href="http://www.digicamhelp.com/camera-features/shooting-modes/face-detection.php" class="broken_link" title="soulmate"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-507 alignright" title="soulmate" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/soulmate-150x147.jpg" alt="soulmate" width="150" height="147" /></a><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Face recognition and tracking.</strong> This one should be a no-brainer. Consumers like to take pictures of people, so Nikon et al has given them a focus mode that fines faces. The camera can then follow that face across the frame to keep it in focus and determine the correct exposure to make sure the people in the shot are what come out. What about this sounds like something professionals wouldn’t want?</p>
<p><strong>The vertical grip needs a revamp</strong>. Maybe I hold my camera vertically more than other people do, but I’m sure the vertical grip isn’t as comfortable as the horizontal one. The big difference is the ridges on the bottom of the camera, which are meant to give some grip on a tripod head, and the back-end controls.</p>
<ul>
	<li> <img class="size-medium wp-image-500 alignright" title="vertgrip" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/vertgrip-138x400.jpg" alt="D3 vertical grip" width="110" height="320" /> The ridges: Who uses a tripod head that’s the size of the entire base of the camera? Really? Isn’t it more important to have the grip be comfortable when you’re holding it — a far more frequent occurrence than putting it on a tripod — believe me. I’d like to some some texturing on the bottom, similar to the horizontal grip.</li>
	<li> <img class="size-full wp-image-502 alignright" title="afael1" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/afael1.jpg" alt="afael1" width="150" height="274" /> The controls: There’s an AF button nicely placed for vertical grip use. But there’s no AF/AE-L button. To use that functionality, you’ve got to use the one intended for the horizontal grip — impossible to do with one hand. (Oh, and while we’re here, that AF/AE-L button is quite a reach even on the horizontal grip, even for my large~ish hands.)</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_504" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-full wp-image-504 " title="screen" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/screen.jpg" alt="Seems like there might be some room for a bigger screen here :)" width="150" height="103" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Seems like there might be some room for a bigger screen here :)</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Bigger screen.</strong> OK, I’ve bought into the hype. Big screens are really cool. They let us actually <em>examine</em> the shot in the field — turns out that’s pretty valuable.  I don’t know how much larger you can get the screen without cramping the buttons or the innards or the battery life, but … I promise to buy it a screen cover for Christmas!</p>
<p><strong>Previews have compression!?</strong> Riddle me this batman: when you zoom into a RAW photo on the camera’s (very large-sized) screen, you see jpeg compression if you get too far in. I presume this is because the camera isn’t actually showing you the RAW file, but the jpeg preview embedded in the file. I’m not sure what amount of engineering is required to get around of this problem — I imagine a lot — but it sure is annoying to zoom in to check detail only to have it obfuscated by the compression. <em>Don&#8217;t have a photo of this (yet)</em></p>
<p><em> </em><strong>Don’t up the megapixel count!</strong> Weird right? Don’t increase something? Coming from me? I understand this is a pretty controversial view, but I’m a photojournalist. I do my photography light-and-fast. Quite frankly, a 12MP file is just perfect for my needs. It gets me plenty of resolution, but doesn’t slow down my post-processing much. I just don’t have the storage space/processor cycles to deal with say… 24MP images of the D3x at the rate I need to work. If a photog wants more resolution, then the D4x/D3x is where to look. Instead, how about keeping the D4 below 14MP and putting the engineering effort into bumping the ISO performance again? Think about this folks: a camera that goes into boost mode after ISO 25,600. Now, that, would change my photography a lot more than a few megapixels.</p>
<p><strong>ISO settings are confusing.</strong> Further on ISO: when the bottom LCD tells me that I’m on ISO “Hi 1.0”, I’ve got to stop a second and do the math — I’m actually at ISO 12,800. Why do you do this to me Nikon!? I just want to know the ISO! I get the fact that you want to emphasize we’re in “boost mode,” but on the huge back LCD that has tons of horizontal real estate, why are we conserving space?  Can’t it read “12,800 boost.”</p>
<p><strong>Small complaint about the menu system.</strong> Nikon’s menu system has gotten much better over the years, it’s mostly logical, and despite the expanded number of options, it’s still pretty easy to find what you want. That said, there’s one command that Nikon buries: time-lapse. This admittedly, infrequently used option, is placed with the play controls — under an entirely different portion of the menu from everything else like it. Could it hurt to put it in a more logical place?</p>
<div id="attachment_505" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-full wp-image-505 " title="metering" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/metering.jpg" alt="How the D300 handles metering." width="150" height="121" /><p class="wp-caption-text">How the D300 handles metering.</p></div>
<p><strong>Switch to control the metering mode is in an odd place.</strong> I struggled to on wether to write this one up, because, I don’t find it to be a problem so much as an oddity.  The switch to set the metering mode is located on the side of the prism, on the top of the camera. It’s an okay place to put it, because it’s something that’s infrequently fiddled with, but it’s not the only place Nikon&#8217;s ever put that control.  Instead of hiding it away on a surface used by no other controls and requiring you to bring the camera down from eye-level to make an adjustment, why not do like the D300, and have a dial around the AE/AF-L button?  It’s not quite as easy to switch modes due to the dial’s stiffness, but that’s alright; at least then metering could join the big boys on the back of the camera.</p>
<div id="attachment_509" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 86px"><img class="size-full wp-image-509 " title="bat" src="http://byjoeybaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/bat.jpg" alt="My laptop (same battery type) gives a percentage, most phones do as well." width="76" height="41" /><p class="wp-caption-text">My laptop (same battery type) gives a percentage, most phones do as well.</p></div>
<p><strong>A battery % meter.</strong> I gather the determining the actual % of charge a battery has remaining is a hard thing to do, prone to inaccuracy and a quick drop at the end of the charge. Nonetheless, we’ve seen it done often enough that it’s time for DSLRs to join up.</p>
<p><strong>Built in dust reduction.</strong> The D700 has it. ‘nough said. <span style="color: #800000;">← </span><em><span style="color: #800000;">Now on the D3s!</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="color: #800000;"> </span></em><strong>In camera VR.</strong> I promise, no puppies will die if Nikon caves and puts sensor-based VR inside the camera.</p>
<h3>Thoughts?</h3>
<p>I think, that&#8217;s my whole list of notes, any thoughts/annoyances of your own?</p>
<h6>A quick note: The Nikon D3s has been released since the writing of this post. It does fix a few issues (video, dust reduction, and <em>awesome</em> ISO performance), but much of this article is still relevant.</h6>
<h6>Update: In the comments, <a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/01/08/nikon-d3/#comment-15048334">pjadams brings up</a> the point that the AF coverage area is smaller on the D3 than on the DX sized D300. It&#8217;s a good addition, not because 51 AF points don&#8217;t give us enough coverage, but because it sucks to have 3D AF tracking loose the subject when they get too close to the edge of the frame.</h6>
<h6>Rumor: The Nikon D4 might make a secret, gaffers-taped, <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/03/rumor-nikon-d4-will-be-tested-at-the-2010-super-bowl-and-winter-olympics.aspx">appearance at the Vancouver Olympics</a>.</h6>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/08/27/nikon-d90-i-thought-this-was-at-least-5-years-out/" rel="bookmark" title="August 27, 2008">Nikon D90: I Thought This Was at Least 5 Years Out</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/09/04/drooling-red-dslr/" rel="bookmark" title="September 4, 2008">Drooling: RED DSLR?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/08/22/canon-might-be-in-trouble/" rel="bookmark" title="August 22, 2008">Canon Might Be in Trouble</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/05/27/inteview-nikons-new-scene-recognition-system/" rel="bookmark" title="May 27, 2008">Inteview: Nikon&#8217;s New Scene Recognition System</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/11/13/red-dsmc/" rel="bookmark" title="November 13, 2008">Red DSMC</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 20.690 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/01/08/nikon-d3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death Valley Photos</title>
		<link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/01/06/death-valley-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/01/06/death-valley-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backpacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My photos]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/blog/?p=487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photos up and and shoot analyzed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a class="flickr-image" title="Death Valley" rel="flickr-mgr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/38315952@N00/3172481857/" target="_blank"></a></span>
<div id="picture"><a class="flickr-image" title="Death Valley" rel="flickr-mgr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/38315952@N00/3172482041/" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft" longdesc="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1015/3172482041_4dd96ae28e_o.jpg" src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1015/3172482041_ed74c0e29b_s.jpg" alt="Death Valley" width="75" height="75" /></a></div>
I&#8217;ve got my <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbaker071//sets/72157612173507639">Death Valley trip photos</a> up on flickr. Not too bad on the time too! Took me 6 days to work up the courage to sort through the nearly 1000 photos I shot, cull, edit, caption, and keyword them all.
No GPS on this trip, so Geotagging is out. Bummer.
<span id="more-487"></span>
Interesting notes about the shoot:
<ul>
	<li>909 images shot; 63 selects</li>
	<li>Lenses used: 17-35mm f/2.8; 105 mm f2.8 micro</li>
	<li>Shot on the Nikon D70 (I know, I really need to upgrade my personal gear)</li>
	<li>Only shot at two ISOs: 200 &amp; 400</li>
	<li>Most common aperture: f/8, followed by f/2.8</li>
	<li>Shutter speeds span from 1/10 to 1/1600</li>
</ul>
My favorite photos from the take:
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a class="flickr-image" title="Death Valley" rel="flickr-mgr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/38315952@N00/3172468801/" target="_blank"></a><a class="flickr-image" title="Death Valley" rel="flickr-mgr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/38315952@N00/3172480763/" target="_blank"><img class="flickr-large" longdesc="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3379/3172480763_c62fa6a22b_o.jpg" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3379/3172480763_684e1e06b6.jpg" alt="Death Valley" /></a></span>
Very closely followed by:
<a class="flickr-image" title="Death Valley" rel="flickr-mgr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/38315952@N00/3172480545/" target="_blank"><img class="flickr-large" longdesc="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3414/3172480545_7383fbc4eb_o.jpg" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3414/3172480545_c2020d4929.jpg" alt="Death Valley" /></a><strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/06/30/nikon-releases-new-gear/" rel="bookmark" title="June 30, 2008">Nikon Releases New Gear</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/08/07/i-leave-for-a-week/" rel="bookmark" title="August 7, 2008">I Leave for a Week!</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/09/22/reverie-the-future/" rel="bookmark" title="September 22, 2008">Reverie: The Future</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/03/09/italy-%e2%80%93-day-15ish/" rel="bookmark" title="March 9, 2008">Italy – Day 1.5~Ish</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/03/10/italy/" rel="bookmark" title="March 10, 2008">Italy</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 16.495 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/01/06/death-valley-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The World Is Our Studio</title>
		<link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/12/01/the-world-is-our-studio/</link>
		<comments>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/12/01/the-world-is-our-studio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/blog/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[24MP, Nikon Lens system, full frame, highest priced Nikon ever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="picture" style=""><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1228104060.html"><img src="http://nikonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/nikon-d3x-released.jpg" width="400"/></a></div>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:right">-<a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1228104060.html">NEWS! &#8211; Nikon announces D3X digital SLR</a></p>
Alright… so the megapixel war is old and worn. It probably doesn&#8217;t really matter too much anymore, but it sure is amazing to see some of these new cameras. 24 MP is a boatload of resolution. Bringing down the base ISO to 100, a really smart move for studio shooters. But, if the <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/">rumors</a> are to be believed, this will be a $8000 camera &#8211; aimed at medium format shooters.
Makes sense… the ease of use of a SLR is really convenient in a studio. Digital backs are really hiRes, but are equally as hard to work with. Not to mention, you can use the Nikkor lens system.
It&#8217;s a bummer that they didn&#8217;t change the layout of the buttons a bit. I like the D300 method of putting the OK button in the center of the command dial.
I&#8217;ll most likely go back and edit this post soon, but for now, I&#8217;m exhausted from a 8 hour marathon to finish a <a href="http://NewsChallenge.org">Knight News Challenge</a> grant for <a href="http://copress.org">CoPress</a>.
<strong>Update:</strong> click <a href="http://www.trustedreviews.com/images/article/inline/9462-d3xiso.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-448];player=img;">here</a> for sample of the D3x at high ISOs. (thanks to <a href="http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2008/12/02/Nikon-D3x-DSLR---Preview/p3">Trusted Reviews</a>)<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/01/08/nikon-d3/" rel="bookmark" title="January 8, 2009">Why the Nikon D3 Sucks (and What the D4 Oughta Be)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/04/09/confessions-of-a-caffeine-addict-i-must-be-american-cause-i-run-on-dunkin/" rel="bookmark" title="April 9, 2008">Confessions of a Caffeine Addict: I Must Be American, &#8217;Cause I Run on Dunkin&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/04/03/quote-by-john-nack-on-adobe-photoshop-lightroom-and-adobes-64-bit-roadmap/" rel="bookmark" title="April 3, 2008">John Nack on Adobe: Photoshop, Lightroom, and Adobe&#8217;s 64-Bit Roadmap</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/06/30/tmz-got-it-right/" rel="bookmark" title="June 30, 2008">TMZ Got It Right!</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/07/08/welcome-adorama-joe-mcnallys-blog/" rel="bookmark" title="July 8, 2008">Welcome Adorama! | Joe McNally&#8217;s Blog</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 23.388 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/12/01/the-world-is-our-studio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red DSMC</title>
		<link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/11/13/red-dsmc/</link>
		<comments>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/11/13/red-dsmc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/blog/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pros, Cons, and remaining questions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="picture" style=""><a href="http://www.red.com/epic_scarlet/"><img src="http://red.cachefly.net/13/main_images/hero_3_large.jpg" width="400"/></a><cite>The Red EPIC, configured as a still camera. (I think)</cite></div>
Well, someone finally did it. You can finally build your own camera. Cobble together all the parts you want with  <a href="http://www.red.com/epic_scarlet/">Red&#8217;s new Epic or Scarlet</a> systems and you get a custom configured video/still camera.
It&#8217;s a shame the thing is so darn expensive.<a href="http://red.cachefly.net/13/page10.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-444];player=img;"> As far as I can see</a>:
<strong>Pros</strong><ul>
	<li>Dynamic range: 11+ or 13+ stops!!</li>
	<li>FPS: 30+!!</li>
	<li>Unless you go real low end, you&#8217;ll be getting really good resolution.</li>
	<li>You can use Canon and Nikon Lenses!</li>
	<li>If you&#8217;ve got the money to put into accessories: configure your &#8216;brain&#8217; as a still camera one day and then a video camera, the next.</li>
</ul>
<strong>Cons</strong>
<ul>
	<li>Price, you&#8217;re gonna have to spend a boatload to get a decent setup. ($7000 to use Nikon or Canon Lenses)</li>
	<li>Judging from the configuration above, this is gonna feel like a medium format camera – the fast and light of a DSLR might be outa the question.</li>
	<li>The earliest we&#8217;re gonna see anything is Spring 2009, and most likely won&#8217;t see the whole line until 2010.</li>
</ul>
<strong>Things I still wanna hear about</strong>
<ul>
	<li>Storage: 24MP at 30FPS is gonna add up fast. Are we storing on harddrives, huge flash drives, what?</li>
	<li>They claim this huge dynamic range: trust, but verify.</li>
	<li>Will there be an optical viewfinder?</li>
	<li>How much do accessories like the DSLR grip cost?</li>
	<li>What about flash? There doesn&#8217;t seem to be a hotshoe.</li>
</ul>
			<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/08/27/nikon-d90-i-thought-this-was-at-least-5-years-out/" rel="bookmark" title="August 27, 2008">Nikon D90: I Thought This Was at Least 5 Years Out</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/09/22/reverie-the-future/" rel="bookmark" title="September 22, 2008">Reverie: The Future</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/09/04/drooling-red-dslr/" rel="bookmark" title="September 4, 2008">Drooling: RED DSLR?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/06/30/nikon-releases-new-gear/" rel="bookmark" title="June 30, 2008">Nikon Releases New Gear</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/08/22/canon-might-be-in-trouble/" rel="bookmark" title="August 22, 2008">Canon Might Be in Trouble</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 24.351 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/11/13/red-dsmc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Practices</title>
		<link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/11/12/best-practices/</link>
		<comments>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/11/12/best-practices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio Slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/blog/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poynter has bestowed a 'best practices' on me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="picture" style=""><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/AdOJOI_uHQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="300" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed> <cite><a href="http://www.poynter.org/content/content_view.asp?id=151739">Awarded Best Practices, The Poynter Institute</a></cite></div>
This is a little old now, but worth mentioning: I&#8217;ve won an awarded a &#8216;best practices&#8217; recognition from the Poynter Institute for the Light the Night audio slideshow above.
I&#8217;m not really accustom to positive re-inforcement, but it did feel good to be told &#8220;good job.&#8221; Especially from an organization like Poynter. I&#8217;m grateful, thank you.
Now let me bite the hand that feeds me. I would never have put this particular show up for &#8216;best practices.&#8217; I think that it&#8217;s a really poor example of an audio slideshow. The photos have nothing to do with the audio, the audio is poor, the interview is poor, and the whole thing is too short for the story involved.
But, I&#8217;ll use one of my favorite words here: meh… whatever. Cheers to the recognition, and let&#8217;s hope someone looks at the article and finds it helpful.<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/07/21/disembedded-marines-send-a-war-photographer-packing/" rel="bookmark" title="July 21, 2008">Disembedded: Marines Send a War Photographer Packing</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/07/06/the-other-front-back-in-kabul-never-at-peace-tyler-hicks-nytimescom/" rel="bookmark" title="July 6, 2008">The Other Front &#8211; Back in Kabul, Never at Peace &#8211; Tyler Hicks &#8211; NYTimes.Com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/09/21/new-media-chaos/" rel="bookmark" title="September 21, 2008">&#8216;New Media&#8217; Chaos</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/05/21/newsorgs-should-offer-freemium-live-interviews/" rel="bookmark" title="May 21, 2009">Newsorgs Should Offer Freemium Live Interviews</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/05/27/inteview-nikons-new-scene-recognition-system/" rel="bookmark" title="May 27, 2008">Inteview: Nikon&#8217;s New Scene Recognition System</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 26.592 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/11/12/best-practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Power of &#8220;the Fourth Effect&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/10/08/the-power-of-the-fourth-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/10/08/the-power-of-the-fourth-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photojournalism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/blog/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worth watching: www.xdrtb.org]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.xdrtb.org/index.php"><img src="http://www.xdrtb.org/images/header_01.png" alt="" width="" height="" border="0" style="float:right"/></a>
If you haven&#8217;t seen it yet, take a few minutes of your time to view <a href="http://www.xdrtb.org">this</a> amazing example of the <a href="http://mediastorm.org/submissions/gathering_audio.htm">&#8220;fourth effect&#8221;</a>. <strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/03/17/pictures-of-the-week-pictures-of-the-week-time/" rel="bookmark" title="March 17, 2008">Pictures of the Week &#8211; Shuttle Launch &#8211; TIME</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/04/28/in-the-jungle-with-farc-alvaro-ybarra-zavala/" rel="bookmark" title="April 28, 2008">In the Jungle With FARC &#8211; Alvaro Ybarra Zavala</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/09/11/business-and-coolness/" rel="bookmark" title="September 11, 2008">Business and Coolness</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/03/25/touring-around-london/" rel="bookmark" title="March 25, 2008">Touring Around London</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/08/10/mccains-surge-screw-up-the-screw-ups-of-campaign-08-time/" rel="bookmark" title="August 10, 2008">Gaffes</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 25.951 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/10/08/the-power-of-the-fourth-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reverie: The Future</title>
		<link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/09/22/reverie-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/09/22/reverie-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/blog/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DSLRs with video. I'm in love.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>no time for words &#8211; let’s let the moving images do the talking</blockquote>
<p style="text-align:right">-<a href="http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2008/10/10/without-further-ado-reverie/">Without further ado: Reverie  «   Vincent Laforet’s Blog</a></p>
Click <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&#038;articleID=2086">here</a> to see the video.
This is the future. It&#8217;s astounding. Amazing. Phenomenal. [Insert your adjectives here.]
Things that stand out to me:
<ul><li>Wide angle glass (the car scene) distorts in a funky way on video. I&#8217;m sure Laforet used a 16-35mm lens to shoot from the hood of the car – it gives a really cool perspective, and the distortion (pretty significant on that lens to begin with) is something else.</li>
<li>The low light capabilities of this camera are amazing.</li>
<li>The dynamic range on this camera is just astounding. See: the rearview mirror shot, the shot from the hood of the car.</li>
<li>The camera can shoot high-speed no problem. See: the tunnel shot.</li>
</ul>
I probably missed a thing or too, but I&#8217;ll end with this: I&#8217;m really glad it&#8217;s DSLRs are merging still photography and video instead of video camera companies tackling the problem. It&#8217;s true that I&#8217;m just more used to the DSLR workflow than video camera workflow, but I really think that video cameras have developed some bad practices that I don&#8217;t like to deal with. Some of these:
<ul>
	<li>Poor low light performance, the solution has been just to add a light to the top of the camera.</li>
	<li>Using tapes. Video went digital but brought analog tapes along with it. This means slow import times, no-reusability of recording media, the need to use tape, etc</li>
	<li>Video camera lenses tend to do telephoto better than DSLR lens do (they&#8217;re smaller and lighter), but still camera lenses have much more creative flexibility (eg. fisheyes, wide-angles, lower f-stops, etc). I know some indie videographers that have setup systems to use still camera lenses on their video cameras.</li>
</ul>
Cheers, to Canon, it looks like you&#8217;ve got a real winner here – let&#8217;s hope Nikon can replicate the performance.
			<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/11/13/red-dsmc/" rel="bookmark" title="November 13, 2008">Red DSMC</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/09/04/drooling-red-dslr/" rel="bookmark" title="September 4, 2008">Drooling: RED DSLR?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/08/27/nikon-d90-i-thought-this-was-at-least-5-years-out/" rel="bookmark" title="August 27, 2008">Nikon D90: I Thought This Was at Least 5 Years Out</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/06/30/nikon-releases-new-gear/" rel="bookmark" title="June 30, 2008">Nikon Releases New Gear</a></li>
<li><a href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/01/06/death-valley-photos/" rel="bookmark" title="January 6, 2009">Death Valley Photos</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 16.271 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://byjoeybaker.com/2008/09/22/reverie-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
