<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Paid Content = Paid Wifi</title> <atom:link href="http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/05/07/paid-content-paid-wifi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/05/07/paid-content-paid-wifi/</link> <description>The &#039;new media&#039; evolution according to a millennial photographer.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Joey Baker</title><link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/05/07/paid-content-paid-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-1176</link> <dc:creator>Joey Baker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 22:41:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/?p=1159#comment-1176</guid> <description>I&#039;m not entirely sure I follow you here. I am arguing that the number of people who need access to financial data immediately is small. &quot;The number of people who really need to have information, right now, has to be a very small percentage of those who read news.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, for the Wall Street folks, immediate access to financial data is worth paying for. It&#039;s the freemium model – give many users access for free, and charge just a few users who need premium features.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not entirely sure I follow you here. I am arguing that the number of people who need access to financial data immediately is small. &#8220;The number of people who really need to have information, right now, has to be a very small percentage of those who read news.&#8221;</p><p>However, for the Wall Street folks, immediate access to financial data is worth paying for. It&#39;s the freemium model – give many users access for free, and charge just a few users who need premium features.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: thewhyoffry</title><link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/05/07/paid-content-paid-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-1175</link> <dc:creator>thewhyoffry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 22:27:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/?p=1159#comment-1175</guid> <description>now, you say financial content, as in oh my bank acct is on empty, or walmart stocks just dropped 30%, cause people arent gonna go all wallstreet immediately with that financial news. and sports eh, most of the time, content timeliness isn&#039;t a huge issue, unless you are trying to follow something live. Time to start working on your octopus board again, guy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now, you say financial content, as in oh my bank acct is on empty, or walmart stocks just dropped 30%, cause people arent gonna go all wallstreet immediately with that financial news. and sports eh, most of the time, content timeliness isn&#39;t a huge issue, unless you are trying to follow something live. Time to start working on your octopus board again, guy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joey Baker</title><link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/05/07/paid-content-paid-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link> <dc:creator>Joey Baker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:41:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/?p=1159#comment-849</guid> <description>I&#039;m not entirely sure I follow you here. I am arguing that the number of people who need access to financial data immediately is small. &quot;The number of people who really need to have information, right now, has to be a very small percentage of those who read news.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, for the Wall Street folks, immediate access to financial data is worth paying for. It&#039;s the freemium model – give many users access for free, and charge just a few users who need premium features.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not entirely sure I follow you here. I am arguing that the number of people who need access to financial data immediately is small. &#8220;The number of people who really need to have information, right now, has to be a very small percentage of those who read news.&#8221;</p><p>However, for the Wall Street folks, immediate access to financial data is worth paying for. It&#39;s the freemium model – give many users access for free, and charge just a few users who need premium features.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: thewhyoffry</title><link>http://byjoeybaker.com/2009/05/07/paid-content-paid-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link> <dc:creator>thewhyoffry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:27:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://byjoeybaker.com/?p=1159#comment-848</guid> <description>now, you say financial content, as in oh my bank acct is on empty, or walmart stocks just dropped 30%, cause people arent gonna go all wallstreet immediately with that financial news. and sports eh, most of the time, content timeliness isn&#039;t a huge issue, unless you are trying to follow something live. Time to start working on your octopus board again, guy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now, you say financial content, as in oh my bank acct is on empty, or walmart stocks just dropped 30%, cause people arent gonna go all wallstreet immediately with that financial news. and sports eh, most of the time, content timeliness isn&#39;t a huge issue, unless you are trying to follow something live. Time to start working on your octopus board again, guy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
