Auto-Aggregation Needs Real-People Editors

The president’s picture should never appear as a representation of the Congress. It’s a marketing/perception problem for aggregation sites.Published July 17, 2008

Related topics

Journalism, , no responses

Last updated Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:20:22 +0000

Written by

Photography introduced me to the 'new media' evolution. I currently do community management at Meraki in San Francisco, but this blog is about journalism, some UX design, and the occasional rant. more →

| joey@byjoeybaker.com

Sharing

The above is a screen shot from daylife.com, a news aggregation site akin to newser, but vastly different from digg or buzz! in that people don’t vote on stories or set content – just about everything, exceptions are cover stories, are auto-generated.This mostly works fine until you get an admittedly minor problem like the one above. Maybe its just because I have a personal grudge against this President for subverting the Congress, but the president’s picture should never appear as a representation of the Congress.Now, this is a relatively minor mistake, and will self-correct once a new story gets sorted to the top of the US Congress category, but nonetheless, its little things like that make me distrust the auto-aggregation model. I think other people feel the same way (purely a feeling). This society wants people to tell them what’s going on, not a computer. It’s a marketing/perception problem.

New Software BlogSoftware DreamVery Good SoftwareReal Downloads